Crackpots have their day in court and get their patooties handed to them.
Damn straight. Gimme that judge any day, who by the way, is a Republican and a churchgoer—not all of em are nutjobs, folks!
There’s something in the article that puzzles me, some guy named William Buckingham, who supported the ID policy, had this to say: “I’m still waiting for a judge or anyone to show me anywhere in the Constitution where there’s a separation of church and state,” he said. “We didn’t lose; we were robbed.”
Um…..
The Establishment Clause? I dunno, back me up here or not folks but isn’t THAT what’s in the Constitution?
This isn’t in the article I posted above, but is another excerpt from Judge John Jones’ ruling:
“Those who disagree with our holding will likely mark it as the product of an activist judge. If so, they will have erred as this is manifestly not an activist Court. Rather, this case came to us as the result of the activism of an ill-informed faction on a school board, aided by a national public interest law firm eager to find a constitutional test case on ID, who in combination drove the Board to adopt an imprudent and ultimately unconstitutional policy."
Yeah, so what if occasionally I have liberal leanings—the wind blows in more than one direction. :-P
There’s something in the article that puzzles me, some guy named William Buckingham, who supported the ID policy, had this to say: “I’m still waiting for a judge or anyone to show me anywhere in the Constitution where there’s a separation of church and state,” he said. “We didn’t lose; we were robbed.”
Um…..
The Establishment Clause? I dunno, back me up here or not folks but isn’t THAT what’s in the Constitution?
This isn’t in the article I posted above, but is another excerpt from Judge John Jones’ ruling:
“Those who disagree with our holding will likely mark it as the product of an activist judge. If so, they will have erred as this is manifestly not an activist Court. Rather, this case came to us as the result of the activism of an ill-informed faction on a school board, aided by a national public interest law firm eager to find a constitutional test case on ID, who in combination drove the Board to adopt an imprudent and ultimately unconstitutional policy."
Yeah, so what if occasionally I have liberal leanings—the wind blows in more than one direction. :-P

